#1080690 by dereine: Fix target/key for querying against sql databases. Therefore don't use db_select anymore.

AN-23459 (AN-24109) changed the text in the error message for missing menu link text from "menu title" to "menu link text" to match the field label in the UI: "link text".

Fix up many of the default wizard views. Blocks now show "titles (linked)" by default, and several unnecessary labels/fields/etc have been removed.

AN-23459 (AN-24048) - bolded the labels for the "create page" and "create block" checkbox labels. Unbolded the labels of configuration options inside the attachment sections.

AN-23459 (AN-24039) - on the views listing page, moved the "enable" view command for disabled views to the top of the operation list so it is the default action.

When a view is enabled, "edit" remains the default action.

Rearrange the row options for nodes to be listed correctly in the wizard. Most important, put "teasers" first (to work around
http://drupal.org/node/1077632, and also because it's more common that you want to use teasers over full posts in a view anyway).

This reverts commit 246ee7a5.

Issue #1046170 by agentrickard, blackice2999, dereine: Execute preExecute before generate the countQuery to fix pagers with node_access.

Change the hover text for the row plugin to make it more clear (and also so that it matches the title of the page you get when you click on it).

Add validation to the "Items per page" field.  Mostly just to help test that the new #limit_validation_errors code is really working, but also
useful in its own right :)

Previously they did not always work correctly (and were not always consistent with each other), depending on the combination of choices that were
made on the form. This commit should fix those issues, and also adds two helper functions that make it easy to correctly add new AJAX-enabled
elements to this dynamic form.

Rewrite the Views contextual links implementation to fix a number of bugs and user experience issues, and to make it more flexible.

This patch is up for review at http://drupal.org/node/876772#comment-4125508 and could undergo changes as a result of that, but I am committing it
here so it we can test and develop against it.